Nancy
Gibbs wrote about the moral puzzle regarding Oscar Pistorious. Pistorious is a
South Africa runner who won gold in the 200 meters at the Athens Paralympics in
2004. Pistorious planned to compete in Olympics in Beijing in 2008 but was banned
from participating because he had his lower legs amputated when he was a year
old. Pistorious use of prosthetic limbs caused the International of Athletes
Federation (IAAF) to disqualify Pistorius from Olympic competition. Gibbs used an ethical approach to examine the
issue because that story has two faces. First, if a person has a disability the
mean that person couldn’t have athlete’s dreams, because will be banned for use
technology and that will be considered an advantage. Second, if the person has
a natural talent, that person needs to be banner, because competition required
equal participant.
I
have mixed emotions as to whether the decision to ban Pistorious was right or
wrong. Pistorius’ situation is an ethical issue of whether natural talent outweighs
technological advantage.
No comments:
Post a Comment